Published Papers - Abstract 174

Young AF, Powers JR & Bell SL. Attrition in longitudinal studies: Who do you lose? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2006; 30(4): 353-361

Objective: To describe the risk factors for various types of attrition in three age cohorts of women in a longitudinal study and to discuss strategies to minimise attrition. Methods: Analysis of survey data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health, collected by mailed questionnaire. In 1996 the study recruited and surveyed a national random sample of ‘younger’ (18-23 years, n=14247), ‘mid-age’ (45-50 years, n=13716), and ‘older’ women (70-75 years, n=12432), and began a staggered cycle of mailed follow-up questionnaires: 1998 (mid-age), 1999 (older), 2000 (younger) and so on. Demographic, health and social risk factors for attrition were examined using multivariate analysis. Results: Attrition at Survey 2 was highest among younger women (32%), mainly due to participants not being contactable (21%), and lower among the older (16%) and mid-age women (10%). At Survey 1, the Survey 2 non-respondents were more likely to report having less education, being born in a non-English speaking country and being a current smoker, in all cohorts, and had poorer health (mid-age and older cohort) and more difficulty managing on their income (younger and mid-age). Conclusion: Although the magnitude of different types of attrition was found to differ by age, there were several risk factors for attrition that remained consistent. These findings are important to inform future studies on ways to lessen or prevent systematic loss of participants. Implications: Recruitment and follow-up methods in longitudinal studies should be tailored to maximise retention of participants at higher risk of dropout.

Return